“Quien no conoce la historia,
está condenado a repetirla”
George Santayana
filósofo, ensayista, poeta y novelista
hispano-estadounidense
“People need to understand that the KKK was always the
paramilitary wing of the Democrats.”
And they need to understand that NAACP was started by a
white man, that Martin Luther King was a Republican, and that the Civil Rights
movement was started by Republicans and hated by Democrats. All true, but the
truth never seems to get out.
MayflowerMadam
The election of Obama to a second term is a watershed moment
in American history and one that should have every white person shaking their
head.
The Election and White Christian American
By Rachel Pendergraft
The Knights Party – America’s Future begins here
Aunque usted no lo crea...
Me motiva a escribir sobre esto porque los demócratas dan
por sentado que se reinvindicaron con Barack Obama y que la verdadera historia
del Ku-Klux-Klan nadie la conoce. Lo que nadie comenta es que el KKK sigue muy
vivo, organizado y que esa “supremacía blanca” no están muy contentos con el
presidente negro a pesar de la pasión que despierta entre los demócratas
liberales y progresistas que lo apoyan y votaron por él.
¿Cómo es posible? Muchos se preguntarán, pero ahí está el
website con sus escritos racistas, no sólo en contra de los negros sino también
de los hispanos. ¡Adiós mis cuartos! ¿qué pasó? ¿Y el Tea Party no eran los
encargados de esta difícil tarea?
A mí me acusan de tetera porque defiendo la posición
política del Tea Party donde sus integrantes son negros, hispanos, blancos, y
mestizos de todo tipo. Los estudié, analicé y pensé, bueno esto no es justo
cuando esta gente lo que hace es defender su nación y los derechos civiles,
pero claro, los fanáticos de Obama cada vez que digo algo, se ponen frenéticos
y me insultan, pues señores, el que esté libre de pecado que tire la primera
piedra como dijo Jesucristo a los juzgadores de la mujer adúltera en esa
clásica escena que narra la Biblia.
Los Estados Unidos están pasando por un mal momento, crisis
económica, polarización, discrimen, pobreza como en la época de la depresión de
los años 30, pero los demócratas están en el poder, convirtiendo a los americanos
en dependientes del gobierno y llevan por el camino de la amargura a los
republicanos acusándolos de todo tipo de cosas y culpándolos del atraso. Ni
hablar del odio sarraceno a Donald Trump y a los millonarios como Romney que
critican la administración del presidente negro y uno se tiene que preguntar...
¿hacia dónde vamos los boricuas con nuestro mandato de estadidad?
Señores, me parece que los estadistas deben empezar a
conocer el mounstro antes de querer entrar a él y... no se asusten no he
cambiado de opinión, sigo siendo estadista, pero lo mejor del mundo es tener el
conocimiento de la historia para ver a quien defendemos y con quien nos
alineamos.
Yo soy republicana por convicción y me parece que los
demócratas tienen mucho que contar, que explicar y muy claramente porque su
proceder de despotricar contra los disidentes que los cuestionan es una manera
muy burda e ignorante de actuar.
Yo sé que la manera más fácil de defenderse es insultando a
título personal pero resulta que para mí eso no funciona, así es que aquí
incluyo algunos “facts” que todo demócrata debe saber antes de diabolizar a los
republicanos. No sean fanáticos trogloditas que en el siglo XXI con tantos
aparatitos que nos conectan instantáneamente con información valiosa y
verdadera, no conocerla es hacer el ridículo ¡ahh! y a los ignorantes
socialistas, no se confíen de lo que le dicen sus líderes populistas, porque
flaco servicio le hacen a la defensa de la democracia y a su intelecto.
En el otro lado del mundo Israel vive una situación de
ataques que podrían desencadenar en algo peor y tenemos a una comunidad
internacional que está de parte de los genocidas islamistas que son la misma
cosa que los nazis de la Alemania de Hitler, ¡prohibido olvidar Auschwitz!
Porque ni Hitler era un santo como tampoco lo fue Mahoma y la historia es como
es y no como los musulmanes nos quieren hacer creer.
Y como yo no me invento nada, aquí reproduzco un artículo
que todo estadista debe leer con detenimiento.
Juzgue usted...
November 4, 2012
Yes’em Master: Modern Day Slavery – The Real History Of The
Democrats and The KKK
Commentary By Gary Boutwell
Real News Reporter – Real News for Independent Thinkers
With three days remaining before the presidential election, we continue to be subjected to some of the most vile, racist rhetoric in memory. Most of this race-baiting garbage is coming from the liberals in the media and the so-called democratic “leadership”. This hatred coming from the left is designed to create deep divisions between the electorate for their own narcissistic, selfish purposes.
Liberals have a great need to feel better about themselves at the expense of others. Constantly attempting to convince themselves and the world at large that they are morally superior to the rest of us because they are so “caring” for the plight of the underclass. When we disagree with their idiotic and immoral assertions, we are slandered by degenerate idiots in the liberal media as bigots, racists, “haters”, etc.
Nothing should be more insulting and condescending than to convey to an entire group of Americans that they cannot achieve their hopes and dreams without the assistance of elitist white liberals. In reality, the message from the liberal progressives is that African Americans, the poor and other ethnic ”minorities’ are inferior to the white population at large and they require their intervention to succeed.
Contrary to the popular notion put forth by the liberal media, the socialist progressives who have taken over the democratic party have little regard for the poor, ethnic minorities or African Americans as a group. What these democrats really care about is creating a dependent class – an entire class of Americans enslaved by the Federal government to create a dependent constituency class and to ensure this dependent class will continue to vote democratic; thereby ensuring the democrats stay in power. At the very root of it, all their social welfare schemes are really designed to use taxpayer money to buy elections.
A few weeks ago, in another one of Joe Biden’s classic gaffes, he said to a group of democratic supporters “They‘re going to put y‘all back in chains.” Perhaps we need to point out to clueless Joe that nearly half of all American households are receiving some sort of Government assistance. This a huge part of the population dependent on the federal government for their basic needs. For these people, they are in “chains”… enslaved to socialist progressive democrats whose only goal is to retain authoritarian power and control over the individual. Modern day slavery disguised as compassion.
The time has come to toss of these ‘chains’ of enslavement created by the liberal democrats and once again recognize it is the power of the individual, not the power of the federal government that enables people to achieve their hopes and dreams of economic freedom and prosperity.
With this in mind, I thought I would visit the real history of the Democratic Party… the history you will never hear about from the “caring” liberal media.
The real history of the KKK and the Democratic Party
The original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white, according to a new television program and book, which describe how the Democrats started the KKK and for decades harassed the GOP with lynchings and threats.
An estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites died at the end of KKK ropes from 1882 to 1964.
The documentation has been assembled by David Barton of Wallbuilders and published in his book “Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White,” which reveals that not only did the Democrats work hand-in-glove with the Ku Klux Klan for generations, they started the KKK and endorsed its mayhem.
“Of all forms of violent intimidation, lynchings were by far the most effective,” Barton said in his book. “Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and their platforms consistently called for a ban on lynching. Democrats successfully blocked those bills and their platforms never did condemn lynchings.”
Further, the first grand wizard of the KKK was honored at the 1868 Democratic National Convention, no Democrats voted for the 14th Amendment to grant citizenship to former slaves and, to this day, the party website ignores those decades of racism, he said.
“Although it is relatively unreported today, historical documents are unequivocal that the Klan was established by Democrats and that the Klan played a prominent role in the Democratic Party,” Barton writes in his book. “In fact, a 13-volume set of congressional investigations from 1872 conclusively and irrefutably documents that fact.
“The Klan terrorized black Americans through murders and public floggings; relief was granted only if individuals promised not to vote for Republican tickets, and violation of this oath was punishable by death,” he said. “Since the Klan targeted Republicans in general, it did not limit its violence simply to black Republicans; white Republicans were also included.”
Barton also has covered the subject in one episode of his American Heritage Series of television programs, which is being broadcast now on Trinity Broadcasting Network and Cornerstone Television.
Barton told WND his comments are not a condemnation or endorsement of any party or candidate, but rather a warning that voters even today should be aware of what their parties and candidates stand for.
His book outlines the aggressive pro-slavery agenda held by the Democratic Party for generations leading up to the Civil War, and how that did not die with the Union victory in that war of rebellion.
 |
| Entrada edificio #4 Auschwitz |
Even as the South was being rebuilt, the votes in Congress consistently revealed a continuing pro-slavery philosophy on the part of the Democrats, the book reveals.
Three years after Appomattox, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, granting blacks citizenship in the United States, came before Congress: 94 percent of Republicans endorsed it.
“The records of Congress reveal that not one Democrat either in the House or the Senate voted for the 14th Amendment,” Barton wrote. “Three years after the Civil War, and the Democrats from the North as well as the South were still refusing to recognize any rights of citizenship for black Americans.”
 |
| Letrero entrada edificio #4 Auschwitz |
He also noted that South Carolina Gov. Wade Hampton at the 1868 Democratic National Convention inserted a clause in the party platform declaring the Congress’ civil rights laws were “unconstitutional, revolutionary, and void.”
It was the same convention when Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, the first grand wizard of the KKK, was honored for his leadership.
Barton’s book notes that in 1868, Congress heard testimony from election worker Robert Flournoy, who confessed while he was canvassing the state of Mississippi in support of the 13th and 14th Amendments, he could find only one black, in a population of 444,000 in the state, who admitted being a Democrat.
Nor is Barton the only person to raise such questions. In 2005, National Review published an article raising similar points. The publication said in 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, deployed the 82nd Airborne Division to desegregate the Little Rock, Ark., schools over the resistance of Democrat Gov. Orval Faubus.
Further, three years later, Eisenhower signed the GOP’s 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats, and in 1964, Democrat President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after former Klansman Robert Byrd’s 14-hour filibuster, and the votes of 22 other Senate Democrats, including Tennessee’s Al Gore Sr., failed to scuttle the plan.
Dems’ website showing jump in history
The current version of the “History” page on the party website lists a number of accomplishments from 1792, 1798, 1800, 1808, 1812, 1816, 1824 and 1828, including its 1832 nomination of Andrew Jackson for president. It follows up with a name change, and the establishment of the Democratic National Committee, but then leaps over the Civil War and all of its issues to talk about the end of the 19th Century, William Jennings Bryan and women’s suffrage.
A spokesman with the Democrats refused to comment for WND on any of the issues. “You’re not going to get a comment,” said the spokesman who identified himself as Luis.
“Why would Democrats skip over their own history from 1848 to 1900?” Barton asked. “Perhaps because it’s not the kind of civil rights history they want to talk about perhaps because it is not the kind of civil rights history they want to have on their website.”
The National Review article by Deroy Murdock cited the 1866 comment from Indiana Republican Gov. Oliver Morton condemning Democrats for their racism.
“Every one who shoots down Negroes in the streets, burns Negro schoolhouses and meeting-houses, and murders women and children by the light of their own flaming dwellings calls himself a Democrat,” Morton said.
It also cited the 1856 criticism by U.S. Sen. Charles Sumner, R-Mass., of pro-slavery Democrats. “Congressman Preston Brooks (D-S.C.) responded by grabbing a stick and beating Sumner unconscious in the Senate chamber. Disabled, Sumner could not resume his duties for three years.”
By the admission of the Democrats themselves, on their website, it wasn’t until Harry Truman was elected that “Democrats began the fight to bring down the final barriers of race and gender.”
“That is an accurate description,” wrote Barton. “Starting with Harry Truman, Democrats began that is, they made their first serious efforts to fight against the barriers of race; yet Truman’s efforts were largely unsuccessful because of his own Democratic Party.”
Even then, the opposition to rights for blacks was far from over. As recently as 1960, Mississippi Democratic Gov. Hugh White had requested Christian evangelist Billy Graham segregate his crusades, something Graham refused to do. “And when South Carolina Democratic Gov. George Timmerman learned Billy Graham had invited African Americans to a Reformation Rally at the state Capitol, he promptly denied use of the facilities to the evangelist,” Barton wrote.
The National Review noted that the Democrats’ “Klan-coddling” today is embodied in Byrd, who once wrote that, “The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.”
The article suggested a contrast with the GOP, which, when former Klansman David Duke ran for Louisiana governor in 1991 as a Republican, was “scorned” by national GOP officials.
 |
| Muchos se cuestionarán como un hombre negro atentará contra los de su propia raza, a lo mejor hasta ni él mismo está al tanto de a lo que pueden llegar sus enemigos que ahora lo endosan. |
Until 1935, every black federal legislator was Republican, and it was Republicans who appointed the first black Air Force and Army four-star generals, established Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a national holiday, and named the first black national-security adviser, secretary of state, the research reveals.
Current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said: “The first Republican I knew was my father, and he is still the Republican I most admire. He joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. My father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I.”
Barton’s documentation said the first opponents of slavery “and the chief advocates for racial equal rights were the churches (the Quakers, Presbyterians, Methodists, etc.). Furthermore, religious leaders such as Quaker Anthony Benezet were the leading spokesmen against slavery, and evangelical leaders such as Presbyterian signer of the Declaration Benjamin Rush were the founders of the nation’s first abolition societies.”
During the years surrounding the Civil War, “the most obvious difference between the Republican and Democrat parties was their stands on slavery,” Barton said. Republicans called for its abolition, while Democrats declared: “All efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery, or to take incipient [to initiate] steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences, and all such efforts have the inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people.”
Wallbuilders also cited John Alden’s 1885 book, “A Brief History of the Republican Party” in noting that the KKK’s early attacks were on Republicans as much as blacks, in that blacks were adopting the Republican identity en masse.
“In some places the Ku Klux Klan assaulted Republican officials in their houses or offices or upon the public roads; in others they attacked the meetings of Negroes and displaced them,” Alden wrote. “Its ostensible purpose at first was to keep the blacks in order and prevent them from committing small depredations upon the property of whites, but its real motives were essentially political. The negroes were invariable required to promise not to vote the Republican ticket, and threatened with death if they broke their promises.”
Barton told WND the most cohesive group of political supporters in American now is African-Americans. He said most consider their affiliation with the Democratic party long-term.
But he said he interviewed a black pastor in Mississippi, who recalled his grandmother never “would let a Democrat in the house, and he never knew what she was talking about.” After a review of history, he knew, Barton said.
Citing President George Washington’s farewell address, Barton told WND, “Washington had a great section on the love of party, if you love party more than anything else, what it will do to a great nation.”
“We shouldn’t love a party [over] a candidate’s principles or values,” he told WND.
Washington’s farewell address noted the “danger” from parties is serious.
“Let me now warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism,” Washington said.¿Qué les parece?
La curiosidad es parte de mi naturaleza, siempre digo que
cuando el enemigo te quiere preocúpate, a Barack Obama lo quieren muchos
enemigos de los Estados Unidos,
para mí eso es suficiente para desconfíar del hombre y cuestionar su
desempeño como presidente porque a la hora de la verdad, Barack Obama se irá
para su casa y serán los estadounidenses los que sufran las consecuencias de
sus actos.
Con tantas amenazas de una tercera guerra mundial me parece
que debemos empezar a identificar quienes son nuestros enemigos externos e
internos. Si queremos ser el estado 51 debemos empezar a conocer quien es
honesto y quien es hipócrita porque no todo lo que se escucha y se publica es
verdad, lamentablemente en Puerto Rico los antiestadistas recurren a toda clase
de argumentos distorsionados para hacerle creer a mucha gente lo que no es.
A mí es muy difícil que me engañen, no confío en nadie, sólo
los ciudadanos americanos tienen el derecho de defender su nación de enemigos
externos e internos y los Estados Unidos tienen demasiados, los más peligrosos
son los que tratan de ocultar la verdad histórica que los condena y no tienen
la honradez de pedir perdón o tratar de reinvindicarse acusando a los que están
mal aunque sean de su mismo partido.
Me resulta altamente sospechoso que el Presidente Barack
Obama no ha dicho nada sobre los resultados del plebiscito. No quiero pensar
que fuerzas ocultas detrás del presidente estén influenciando para que no
ocurra nada sobre la anexión, en la política nada se puede descartar porque como
siempre he dicho, el racismo no es específicamente de blancos hacia negros y es
altamente sospechoso que durante la administración Obama es cuando más hispanos
han sido deportados y en la mente de muchos no cabe, que un estado hispano se
una a la nación más democrática del planeta... aunque usted no lo crea.
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes,
exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not
commit suicide.
John Adams (1814)
2do Presidente de Estados Unidos
Estaré muy atenta a lo que pase en estos cuatro años con
Obamanation y los estadistas en Puerto Rico, a ver quien finalmente es el racista y el hipócrita.
Such is Life!
