¿Tranquilos?
Nadie está tranquilo en estos tiempos.
¿Por qué?
No es por Trump, es por el próximo Papa...
Estos días previos, durante las congregaciones, los 252 cardenales -133 electores- “se están poniendo de acuerdo para ver a quién votar ahora”, como en “cualquier asamblea de estas características”.El teólogo insiste en que en América Latina “no se juega una posición a favor o en contra de Francisco”, sino que esa “polarización parece ser más notable entre los cardenales europeos, los estadounidenses y los africanos”.Si el debate “se polarizara mucho, es posible que se acuerde una figura de consenso: alguien que de algún modo haya estado cerca de Francisco y a la vez escuche con empatía a los sectores más críticos”, asegura Caamaño, que dice que los cardenales “adversos” al papa argentino “son muy ruidosos, pero no parecen ser muchos”.“Hay un grupo más pequeño, combativo y otro más silencioso, mayoritario”, que “se ha sentido conmovido con la predicación de Francisco” y que quiere que “la Iglesia preste atención a la compleja situación que vive el mundo”, con “inmensos sectores que están pasando momentos de mucha crueldad”.“Entre todos los que han seguido esa mirada, que son un gran número, ahí es donde estaría el desafío de conseguir un candidato capaz de aunar esos enfoques”, dice, citando al español Cristobal López, arzobispo de Rabat, o los italianos Pierbattista PIzzaballa, patriarca de Jerusalén, y Baldasarre Reina, vicario para Roma.Sin olvidar al cardenal estadounidense Robert Francis Prevost, “que trabajó muchísimo con Francisco” y le nombró responsable de los obispos del mundo y de su comisión para Latinoamérica.Latinoamérica en el cónclave: apoyo al legado de Francisco, pero a dos velocidades"La mayoría de los cardenales que van a votar en el cónclave por América Latina han sido nombrados por Francisco" y "han acompañado su agenda en el compromiso con los más desvalidos, en el ecológico y en su forma de comprender la Iglesia como una casa con puertas abiertas a todos", explica José Carlos Caamaño, profesor de Teología de la Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina.Por EFE 5 mayo, 2025
¿Vale más la "doctrina De Francisco" que la fe en Jesucristo como principio para escoger un Papa?
Son preguntas interesantes que merecen respuestas honestas.
Crecí en la Iglesia Católica y terminé decepcionada, como muchos otros católicos que se han dado cuenta que El Vaticano, más que el Estado que representa a Jesucristo, se ha convertido en una religión de hombres corruptos que lo menos que importa es la Biblia sino el capricho de los gobernantes, no me refiero a Donald Trump, me refiero a la cantidad de integrantes De la Iglesia Católica que le dan más peso a la doctrina geopolítica llamada Agenda 2030, que preparar a los fieles para la Segunda Venida de Jesucristo, que se supone está más cerca dada la situación mundial que anuncia la Biblia sobre el principio de dolores y la historia de Israel como pueblo de Dios.
Crecí en la Iglesia Católica y terminé decepcionada, como muchos otros católicos que se han dado cuenta que El Vaticano, más que el Estado que representa a Jesucristo, se ha convertido en una religión de hombres corruptos que lo menos que importa es la Biblia sino el capricho de los gobernantes, no me refiero a Donald Trump, me refiero a la cantidad de integrantes De la Iglesia Católica que le dan más peso a la doctrina geopolítica llamada Agenda 2030, que preparar a los fieles para la Segunda Venida de Jesucristo, que se supone está más cerca dada la situación mundial que anuncia la Biblia sobre el principio de dolores y la historia de Israel como pueblo de Dios.
Es en este momento histórico que fallece Francisco, un Papa abiertamente socialista y así fue su legado católico, no lo digo yo, lo dicen los mismo clérigos perseguidos por Francisco, la noticia de EFE en el Panam Post lo describe como un grupo pequeño "muy ruidoso", pero que la mayoría católica "silente" prefiere la doctrina socialista del legado de Francisco, yo honestamente dudo mucho que sean mayoría, esa mayoría silente, sólo quiere conocer la paz de Jesucristo que sobrepasa todo entendimiento, esa, no es la realidad en el mundo actual y en El Vaticano, lo deberían saber. ¿O se hacen los sordos, mudos y ciegos?
¿La verdad nos hace libres?
El mundo está cambiando al conservadurismo, a la derecha, porque está más que probado, que el socialismo es lo más lejos que se puede estar De Dios. Entonces, los cristianos lógicamente no podemos aceptar que los comunistas y socialistas que se han autodefinido como ateos, han ofendido a Dios violando los diez mandamientos, han perseguido la Iglesia, de todas las denominaciones, porque no aceptan que Dios esté por encima del líder, ahora pretenden controlar quien será el próximo Papa De la Iglesia Católica para desde El Vaticano imponer la Iglesia Universal, una sola religión controlada por el Nuevo Orden Mundial y una doctrina perversa completamente depravada.
Esto no es teoría de conspiración, ni un libreto de una película de ficción al mejor estilo Hollywood, es la vida real, es la verdad profética de la que habla el libro de Apocalipsis y que se desvela ante nuestros ojos cuando estudiamos a los protagonistas de este momento histórico que nos dicen que lo malo en bueno y lo bueno, es malo.
Juzgue usted...
Juzgue usted...
CHINA AND GLOBALIZATION
China aims to carve out a central role for itself in the New World Order, and it is the techno-capitalist oligarchy that intends to dictate its structure and rules, as has already happened with the psychopandemic fraud since 2019. The Davos Forum – the expression of a very powerful supranational lobby – is so enthusiastic about the binomial dictatorship-Agenda2030 that it held its Meeting of the New Champions, the annual summer meeting of 1500 global leaders, in Tianjin in June 2023. China is indispensable for its collaboration in the process of the sinicization of the global market, which implies the use of geoengineering, interventions in the agri-food sector (synthetic meat, GMO foods), the privatization of resources (including water), the imposition of social credits, digital currency, and the capillary monitoring of every human activity. The globalist elite, in short, considers China as a laboratory in which the communist totalitarian regime makes possible, by force, what Western democracies cannot achieve without systematically violating Constitutions and laws. It is therefore the Western world that – in the plans of the globalists – will have to give up democracy and freedom in order to transform itself into a dictatorial technocracy managed by the “shareholders” of power, that is, by those who manage it financially. The limitations that the Chinese government imposes in the religious sphere are therefore destined to become the norm in Western countries too, thanks to forms of censorship and social control.
Without China there is no globalization, no financialization, no digitalization. Without China it is not possible to achieve that Great Reset based on the dismantling of the power of the (Christian) West through programmed deindustrialization and Islamization. The goal is the transformation of man into a number. As then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger said in 2000, addressing the seminarians of Palermo (here): “The machines that have been built impose this same law, this same law that was adopted in the concentration camps. According to the logic of the machine, according to the owners of the machine, man must be interpreted by a computer, and this is only possible if man is translated into numbers.” He continued: “The Beast is a number, and transforms us into numbers. God our Father instead has a name, and calls each of us by name. He is a person, and when he looks at each of us he sees a person, a person who is loved.” It is hard to believe that someone who was so clear about the danger posed by globalist technocratic dystopia would have ever supported as pope the establishment of that regime by propagating gene serums, abortion, and euthanasia, social control, and the LGBTQ agenda.
The pontificate of Benedict XVI was fiercely opposed and impeded on several fronts, to the point that John Podesta theorized Benedict’s replacement with a pope aligned with the globalist agenda who would introduce gender equality, the decriminalization of sodomy, so-called “reproductive health,” the legitimization of divorce, the condemnation of the death penalty, Malthusian environmentalism, and the health policies of the WHO. This is exactly the agenda Jorge Bergoglio imposed, as soon as he was appointed Pope, while Benedict XVI was completely against any normalization of relations with China that did not include the recognition of the full prerogatives of the Apostolic See over Catholics and the Catholic Hierarchy in China. The plan for the social and economic destruction of Europe to the full advantage of the Chinese dictatorship would never have found an accomplice in Pope Benedict XVI, despite the pressure from the Jesuits and ultra-progressive “Catholics”.
THE CREATORS OF THE SECRET AGREEMENT
John Podesta, in addition to organizing a “Catholic Spring” in the Vatican, appeared several times as an enthusiastic supporter of trade relations with China. His interventions – which followed the line dictated by the Clinton, Obama and Biden Administrations – provide confirmation of Beijing’s ability to have its own agents within the government of the United States of America who supported China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (here e here).
On behalf of all these Administrations and the Holy See, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick carried out intense diplomatic activity with China, a nation he visited at least eight times, staying at the seminary of the “patriotic church” (here). It was he who declared, in an interview with The Global Times: “I see a lot of things happening that would really open a lot of doors because President Xi and his government are concerned about the things that Pope Francis is concerned about” (here), and that Bergoglio and Xi could together be “a special gift to the world.”
The Catholic News Agency reports that “in 2009, the Archbishop had a message delivered to a friend in China through Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the House of Representatives. Pelosi passed McCarrick’s greetings to Bishop Aloysius Jin of Shanghai, formerly one of China’s leading Jesuits.” Jin was at the time a “bishop” of the schismatic “patriotic church.”
The journalist Maria Antonietta Calabrò wrote in this regard: “The former cardinal’s visits included meetings with Wang Zuo’an, head of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, and the late Bishop Fu Tieshan, former president of the bishops, that is, the Conference of the Catholic Church in China (BCCCC), an organization not recognized by the Holy See. In June 2014, David Gibson reported in the Washington Post that McCarrick had traveled to China ‘last year’ for ‘confidential meetings on religious freedom.’ This detail confirms the testimony of former Apostolic Nncio Viganò who said he met McCarrick in June 2013 in the Vatican, who told him, ‘The Pope received me yesterday, tomorrow I will go to China.’ McCarrick was hosted by the Beijing seminary during at least two trips to China, according to a 2006 State Department cable published by Wikileaks. The vice-rector of a seminary under the control of the Communist state, Father Shu-Jie Chen, is in fact described twice as McCarrick’s guest in the diplomatic account of Christopher Sandrolini, Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See. Chen described himself as ‘the king’ of the seminary, saying he could do whatever he wanted within its walls. The diplomat also noted in his account that the vice-rector ‘downplayed the persecution of the underground Church,’ and that ‘evangelization was not an option for official religious personnel.’ However, there appears to have been – CNA reports – an interruption in McCarrick’s travels to China between 2006 and 2013, (i.e. during the papacy of Benedict XVI) even though his influence in China was still active. So, as you can see, the China dossier for the Vatican intersects with that of pedophilia and the Viganò case. And this could unleash new attacks against Francis, with the accusation of having ‘sold out’ the appointment of bishops to the Communist Party” (here).
THE BLACKMAILABILITY OF THE NEGOTIATORS
Darrick Taylor wrote in Crisis Magazine (here) on 14 May 2024: “However, that doesn’t mean that there might not be some plausible scenarios in which interested outside parties could have influenced the Vatican. The most obvious is the Vatican agreement with China, which the Vatican, for inexplicable reasons, sent Theodore McCarrick to negotiate. It is no great stretch to suppose that the CCP blackmailed such a compromised figure, and it is not crazy to think something of that nature could be the reason for the disastrous agreement. The most fanciful conspiracies regarding Francis have to do with his election, and I could be persuaded that interested governments would be willing to exert influence on a papal election. The most likely candidates would be the aforementioned CCP but also the United States government. The WikiLeaks emails revealed liberal Democratic politicians (here) in Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign (including John Podesta, a baptized Catholic) discussing the need for an “Arab Spring” in the Catholic Church. It is not lunacy to imagine a liberal Democratic president crossing the line from speculating to actually manipulating Church officials via bribes or other inducements.”
Bergoglio has clearly obeyed his masters – traceable to the subversive globalist elite – evading the resolution of all concrete problems with the sole purpose of destroying any internal resistance by the clandestine Church and replacing the Bishops faithful to the Apostolic See with government emissaries. Behind all this, as we know, there is the broader process of the normalization of international relations with the Chinese dictatorship, an indispensable partner of the globalists in establishing the New World Order.
Benedict XVI was an obstacle to China’s expansionist aims: it was necessary to hasten the end of his pontificate and have an emissary of the globalist left on the Throne of Peter.
This confirms the link between the deep state and the deep church that I have denounced since 2020, which sees two forces of the same subversive matrix united in the globalist coup of the New World Order, whose objective is the usurpation of authority in the civil and religious spheres to demolish the institutions over which they illegitimately preside.
PAROLIN AND ZUPPI AS EMISSARIES OF COMMUNIST CHINA
Among the protagonists of the Sino-Vatican Secret Agreement is also the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, who spoke at the 47th World Economic Forum in Davos in 2017, at the Bilderberg Group meeting in 2018, and at the United Nations “Adaptation Summit” on climate change in 2021. It is not surprising that Parolin now enjoys the maximum support of the communist dictatorship of Beijing and all its emissaries and sponsors, both lay and ecclesiastical.
The President of the Italian Bishops’ Conference (CEI), Matteo Zuppi, is also a supporter of the Secret Agreement, as an expression of the Community of Sant’Egidio and its founder Andrea Riccardi.
Whoever today is considering Parolin or Zuppi as papabili will have to consider what their response would be to the provocation of the Chinese Government represented by the appointment of the two “bishops” without apostolic mandate. Their completely complacent attitude towards Beijing is the worst premise for any hope that, going forward, the papacy will attempt to heal the very serious wound to the unity of the Catholic Church constituted by the Sino-Vatican Secret Agreement (here).
For this reason, it is essential that Cardinal Parolin make public the full text of the secret Agreement before proceeding to the election of the new Pope.
CONCLUSION
This story involves millions of persecuted Chinese Catholics. The Church of silence is confronted with the silence of the Church, with the complicity and betrayal of cynical and corrupt clergymen who are interested in supporting the plans of the globalist elite and the communist dictatorship of Beijing. Bergoglio’s heirs – Pietro Parolin and Matteo Zuppi first of all – want to ensure the support of the powerful of the earth because the communist model of a national church under government control allows the realization of their idea of the church. They consider this state church as the most effective instrument to impose the heretical vision of Bergoglian synodality, behind which hides the same tyrannical nature of the Chinese regime and the globalist elite.
The preparatory schema of the Ecumenical Council Vatican II – documents that the maneuvers of the Innovators disdainfully cancelled – envisaged the solemn condemnation of atheistic materialism. Today we now understand the disastrous consequences of the cowardice and complicity of many Prelates – including John XXIII and Paul VI – in the face of the threat of Communism and above all the realization of the criminal dystopian project that only a dictatorship is able to realize. I wonder how many of the Cardinals present at the Conclave of 1958 realized the impending danger and the consequences – not different from the current ones – of their vote, thanks to which Roncalli was able to dictate to the Church the line of détente with regard to Communist regimes. Past experience should be a warning to guide present action.
We can only express our firmest condemnation of the pactum sceleris that unites the Chinese communist dictatorship, the techno-financial oligarchs of Davos, and the usurpers of authority in the Catholic Church. What motivates the persecutory action of these people is their hatred for the loyalty of Chinese Catholics to the Church and the Papacy: not to a patriotic and national church, not to a humanitarian NGO, not to an entity without either dogma or morality serving anti-human ideologies, but to that One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church which is and remains – because founded on Our Lord Jesus Christ, the cornerstone – the only true and inescapable καθῆκον (2 Thess 2:6-7) against the establishment of the kingdom of the Antichrist.Mons. Carlo Maria ViganòDECLARATIONon the Secret sino-vatican AgreementTHE VIOLATION OF THE SINO-VATICAN AGREEMENT+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
2 May 2025
S.cti Athanasii Episcopi et Ecclesiæ Doctoris
¿Qué les parece?
¿Nos debemos preocupar los cristianos?
¡Claro que sí!
Pero no por las razones que quiere Benjamín, el problema no es Donald Trump, en mi opinión, su mensaje es, elijan un Papa MVGA (Make Vatican Great Again) , un Papa que ponga a Jesucristo y la doctrina bíblica por encima de los caprichos del globalismo depredador de la humanidad como lo es el comunismo chino.
¿Es mucho pedir?
Catholics for Catholics and General Michael Flynn Rally in Support of Ed Martin, Trump’s Nominee for U.S. Attorney, in face of Establishment PushbackMay 4, 2025 | by Catholics for Catholics
La izquierda mundial está preocupada, los católicos republicanos en USA también, es motivo de preocupación la amenaza de la Agenda globalista, es real, porque ellos disfrazan su ideología satánica de falsos profetas y esperan al Anticristo, por eso predican el anticristianismo, han confundido a los buenos católicos, polarizan y persiguen a los pueblos judeo-cristianos, eso es lo que les preocupa a los verdaderos cristianos, que esperan la 2da venida de Cristo y la salvación eterna, porque ven que los hombres son incapaces de hacer el bien, quien conoce la palabra De Dios conoce a su pastor, lo escucha y lo sigue, por eso está convencido que con la derecha, las cosas irán mejor.
Sin embargo, los conservadores no se dan por vencidos e intentarán colocar al frente del Vaticano a un pontífice que rompa con la vía progresista de Francisco y recupere la doctrina de Benedicto XVI, contraria a las bendiciones a homosexuales y al aumento del protagonismo de la mujer en la Iglesia.El guineano Robert Sarah es el conservador con más opciones de ser el sucesor de Francisco, aunque el nombre del cardenal estadounidense Raymond Leo Burke ha cobrado mucha fuerza, en parte, por estar respaldado por Donald Trump.
Por qué será difícil que un cardenal conservador sea papa: así fue el último golpe de mano de Francisco antes de morir¿Por qué es importante? Tres cuartas partes de los 135 cardenales que participarán en el cónclave han sido nombrados por el papa Francisco y la mayoría de ellos son de un marcado perfil progresista.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, left, talks with Cardinal Robert Sarah, then-prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, in October 2015. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini, File)
Un Papa conservador que cambie la doctrina de Francisco, eso es lo que quiere Trump, eso es lo mismo que quiere el pueblo cristiano y católico que espera con su lámpara encendida a Jesucristo en su 2da venida.Such is Life!
