viernes, 13 de marzo de 2015

Las cartas secretas de Obama a Jamenei...

Cualquiera que piense que es posible confiar en Teherán si es poseedor de ‘cualquier tipo de capacidad nuclear es un ‘estupido’,” 
dijo el ex alcalde de Nueva York a exiliados iraníes en una conferencia de Berlín. 
Giuliani critica la ‘imprudencia’ de Obama sobre Irán 
Por Esti Peled el 08 March 2015 

¿Es Obama un estúpido?
“Irán no aceptará demandas excesivas e ilógicas”, comentó Zarif, citado por la televisión local Press TV, y señaló que la propuesta de Obama está expresada en términos inaceptables y amenazantes.
Irán tilda de "inaceptable" la propuesta de Obama de congelar 10 años la actividad nuclear
El ministro de Exteriores iraní, Mohamad Javad Zarif, tachó de "inaceptable" la afirmación del presidente de EEUU, Barack Obama, de que Teherán debe congelar sus actividades nucleares por al menos 10 años para que se alcance un acuerdo.
MARZO 3, 2015 
Upps, ¿Qué pasó?
¿No les gustó la propuesta de Obama?

Se ha formado un revuelo en la liberal media por una carta que firmaron 47 congresistas republicanos, luego del mensaje de Netanyahu, y enviaron al Ayatolá Jamenei de la República Islámica de Irán, una carta donde establecen que cuando cambie la presidencia de los Estados Unidos y la mayoría del Congreso a republicanos, anularán cualquier acuerdo que haga Obama ahora.

Algunos demócratas están ofendidos por eso y Jamenei también...

Mehr quoted Khamenei as saying: “Of course I am worried, because the other side is known for opacity, deceit and backstabbing.
“Every time we reach a stage where the end of the negotiations is in sight, the tone of the other side, specifically the Americans, becomes harsher, coarser and tougher. This is the nature of their tricks and deceptions.”
The clerical Supreme Leader said the letter was “a sign of the decay of political ethics in the American system”, and he described as risible long-standing U.S. accusations of Iranian involvement in terrorism.
Khamenei condemns Republican letter on Iran, bemoans U.S. 'tricks'
DUBAI Thu Mar 12, 2015
tricks and deceptions?
decay of political ethics in the American system?

Pero ¿qué fue lo que hizo Obama con Irán antes de asumir la presidencia en el 2008? 
Le envió una comunicación a Jamenei para que esperara a que él fuera presidente para negociar, ganó y desde ese entonces han negociado secretamente.

¿Qué le ofreció Obama que ahora no cumple?
¡Ahh esa es una pregunta muy interesante!

¿Es ético que un presidente envíe cartas secretas a un enemigo de su nación para combatir insurgentes que le están haciendo el favor de degollar infieles?
¿No es esto cuestionable?
¿No es esto un acto de traición a la patria?
Irán no es un enemigo pequeño, es dirigido por el líder religioso que dirige el Islam mundialmente, en contra de los infieles de occidente y que tiene mandato directo en el poder militar iraní.

Esto se publicó en el 2014
Juzgue usted...
Obama Wrote Secret Letter to Iran’s Khamenei About Fighting Islamic State
Presidential Correspondence With Ayatollah Stresses Shared U.S.-Iranian Interests in Combating Insurgents, Urges Progress on Nuclear Talks
Nov. 6, 2014
WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama secretly wrote to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the middle of last month and described a shared interest in fighting Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria, according to people briefed on the correspondence.
The letter appeared aimed both at buttressing the campaign against Islamic State and nudging Iran’s religious leader closer to a nuclear deal.
Mr. Obama stressed to Mr. Khamenei that any cooperation on Islamic State was largely contingent on Iran reaching a comprehensive agreement with global powers on the future of Tehran’s nuclear program by a Nov. 24 diplomatic deadline, the same people say.
The October letter marked at least the fourth time Mr. Obama has written Iran’s most powerful political and religious leader since taking office in 2009 and pledging to engage with Tehran’s Islamist government.
The correspondence underscores that Mr. Obama views Iran as important—whether in a potentially constructive or negative role—to his emerging military and diplomatic campaign to push Islamic State from the territories it has gained over the past six months.
Mr. Obama’s letter also sought to assuage Iran’s concerns about the future of its close ally, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, according to another person briefed on the letter. It states that the U.S.’s military operations inside Syria aren’t targeted at Mr. Assad or his security forces.
Mr. Obama and senior administration officials in recent days have placed the chances for a deal with Iran at only 50-50. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is set to begin intensive direct negotiations on the nuclear issue with his Iranian counterpart, Javad Zarif, on Sunday in the Persian Gulf country of Oman.
“There’s a sizable portion of the political elite that cut their teeth on anti-Americanism,” Mr. Obama said at a White House news conference on Wednesday about Iran’s leadership, without commenting on his personal overture. “Whether they can manage to say ‘Yes’…is an open question.”
For the first time this week, a senior administration official said negotiations could be extended beyond the Nov. 24 deadline, adding that the White House will know after Mr. Kerry’s trip to Oman whether a deal with Iran is possible by late November.
“We’ll know a lot more after that meeting as to whether or not we have a shot at an agreement by the deadline,” the senior official said. “If there’s an extension, there’re questions like: What are the terms?”
Mr. Obama’s push for a deal faces renewed resistance after Tuesday’s elections gave Republicans control of the Senate and added power to thwart an agreement and to impose new sanctions on Iran. Sens. Mark Kirk (R., Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D., N.J.) have introduced legislation to intensify sanctions.
“The best way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is to quickly pass the bipartisan Menendez-Kirk legislation—not to give the Iranians more time to build a bomb,” Mr. Kirk said Wednesday.

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) expressed concern when asked about the letter sent by Mr. Obama.
“I don’t trust the Iranians, I don’t think we need to bring them into this,” Mr. Boehner said. Referring to the continuing nuclear talks between Iran and world powers, Mr. Boehner said he “would hope that the negotiations that are under way are serious negotiations, but I have my doubts.”
In a sign of the sensitivity of the Iran diplomacy, the White House didn’t tell its Middle East allies—including Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates—about Mr. Obama’s October letter to Mr. Khamenei, according to people briefed on the correspondence and representatives of allied countries.
Leaders from these countries have voiced growing concern in recent weeks that the U.S. is preparing to significantly soften its demands in the nuclear talks with Tehran. They said they worry the deal could allow Iran to gain the capacity to produce nuclear weapons in the future.
Arab leaders also fear Washington’s emerging rapprochement with Tehran could come at the expense of their security and economic interests across the Middle East. These leaders have accused the U.S. of keeping them in the dark about its diplomatic engagements with Tehran.
The Obama administration launched secret talks with Iran in the Omani capital of Muscat in mid-2012, but didn’t notify Washington’s Mideast allies of the covert diplomatic channel until late 2013.
Senior U.S. officials declined to discuss Mr. Obama’s letter to Mr. Khamenei after questions from The Wall Street Journal.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest on Thursday declined to comment on what he called “private correspondence” between the president and world leaders, but acknowledged U.S. officials in the past have discussed the Islamic State campaign with Iranian officials on the sidelines of international nuclear talks. He added the negotiations remain centered on Iran’s nuclear program and reiterated that the U.S. isn’t cooperating militarily with Iran on the Islamic State fight.
Administration officials didn’t deny the letter’s existence when questioned by foreign diplomats in recent days.
Mr. Khamenei has proved a fickle diplomatic interlocutor for Mr. Obama in the past six years.
Mr. Obama sent two letters to Iran’s 75-year-old supreme leader during the first half of 2009, calling for improvements in U.S.-Iran ties, which had been frozen since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Tehran.
Mr. Khamenei never directly responded to the overtures, according to U.S. officials. And Iran’s security forces cracked down hard that year on nationwide protests that challenged the re-election of then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, stands in front of a jeep as he inspects 110,000 hardline Basij militia voluteers. (photo credit:REUTERS)
Mr. Khamenei is believed to be the decision maker on the nuclear program.  
U.S.-Iran relations have thawed considerably since the election of President Hasan Rouhani in June 2013. He and Mr. Obama shared a 15-minute phone call in September 2013, and Messrs. Kerry and Zarif have regularly held direct talks on the nuclear diplomacy and regional issues.
Still, Mr. Khamenei has often cast doubt on the prospects for better relations with Washington. He has criticized the U.S. military campaign against Islamic State, which is also known as ISIS or ISIL, claiming it is another attempt by Washington and the West to weaken the Islamic world.
“America, Zionism, and especially the veteran expert of spreading divisions—the wicked government of Britain—have sharply increased their efforts of creating divisions between the Sunnis and Shiites,” Mr. Khamenei said in a speech last month, according to a copy of it on his website. “They created al Qaeda and [Islamic State] in order to create divisions and to fight against the Islamic Republic, but today, they have turned on them.”
Current and former U.S. officials have said Mr. Obama has focused on communicating with Mr. Khamenei specifically because they believe the cleric will make all the final decisions on Iran’s nuclear program and the fight against Islamic State.
Mr. Rouhani is seen as navigating a difficult balance of gaining Mr. Khamenei’s approval for his foreign policy decisions while trying to satisfy Iranian voters who elected him in the hope of seeing Iran re-engage with the Western world.
The emergence of Islamic State has drastically changed both Washington’s and Tehran’s policies in the Middle East.
Mr. Obama was elected on the pledge of ending Washington’s war in Iraq. But over the past three months, he has resumed a U.S. air war in the Arab country, focused on weakening Islamic State’s hold of territory in western and northern Iraq.
Iran has had to mobilize its own military resources to fight against Islamic State, according to senior Iranian and U.S. officials.
Tehran’s elite military unit, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, has sent military advisers into Iraq to help the government of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, a close Iranian ally. The IRGC has also worked with Syrian President Assad’s government, and Shiite militias from across the Mideast, to conduct military operations inside Syria.
U.S. officials have stressed that they are not coordinating with Tehran on the fight against Islamic State.
But the State Department has confirmed that senior U.S. officials have discussed Iraq with Mr. Zarif on the sidelines of nuclear negotiations in Vienna. U.S. diplomats have also passed on messages to Tehran via Mr. Abadi’s government in Baghdad and through the offices of Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, among the most powerful religious leaders in the Shiite world.
Among the messages conveyed to Tehran, according to U.S. officials, is that U.S. military operations in Iraq and Syria aren’t aimed at weakening Tehran or its allies.
“We’ve passed on messages to the Iranians through the Iraqi government and Sistani saying our objective is against ISIL,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on these communications. “We’re not using this as a platform to reoccupy Iraq or to undermine Iran.”
—Michael R. Crittenden contributed to this article.
¿Qué les parece?

Obama no contaba con que Benjamín Netanyahu daría un mensaje invitado por Boehmer, trajo a la discusión pública el issue y le dañó su negociación hecha de espaldas al pueblo americano. Esa es la realidad, que Obama no ha demostrado ser aliado de Israel incondicionalmente porque piensa diferente, eso es evidente, si lo ha hecho es porque no le queda otra opción dada la histórica relación de gobiernos anteriores. El presidente African American, con raíces musulmanas, de la nación cristiana y que tiene como motto "In God We Trust" negocia con islámicos que quieren destruir el estado de Israel que a su vez es protegido por Dios segun expresa la Biblia. 

¿No es esto peligroso para la seguridad nacional de USA?

También cabe cuestionar como es posible que los que critican a los evangélicos y a la menor provocación de una protesta o presencia en el Congreso para oponerse a una ley, lo cual es su derecho como ciudadano, sacan lo de la división Iglesia-Estado, sin embargo el presidente y su secretario de estado negocian con un clérigo radical islámico, como lo es Jamenei, por encima de un presidente electo en una elección en ese país, que odia a los “infieles”, que somos todos los de este lado del mundo sin distinción de que sea cristiano o ateo.

“Just because the enemy of your enemy sometimes wants to help you, that doesn’t mean they’re still not your adversary,”
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers
GOP blasts Obama’s Iran letter

Después de ver todo esto, me parece que otra vez Fufi Santori se equivocó en etiquetar a los americanos feos cuando se refirió a los republicanos y a Rudolph Giuliani específicamente.

Dice él...

Rudy Giulianni viene a Puerto Rico a rendirle tributo al capital y de paso llevarse unos pesitos para su alcancía. ¿Qué puede inspirar la oratoria de un político  que es imagen del republicanismo rancio y un hombre embrutecido por sus prejuicios y capaz de ofender a título personal al presidente de sus Estados Unidos?
09 de marzo de 2015

¿Fufi defendiendo a Obama?
¿Interesante no?

No es americano feo el que defiende la nación de sus enemigos que lo quieren destruir, ni el que aporta a su nación con inventos y maneras de hacer riquezas, ser rico no es malo si el capital se levanta gracias al propio esfuerzo. Malo es el que se enriquece robando y extendiendo la mano a inversionistas políticos como lo hizo Obama cuando vino a Puerto Rico y se llevó un millón de billetes de donantes populares y se vendió para obstruir los avances de los estadistas. Americanos feos son los Charlie Black de la vida que siembran la semilla de la duda diciendo que Puerto Rico será un estado demócrata y marxista para que los epublicanos nos rechacen.

Los demócratas podrán decir públicamente una cosa y tras bastidores otra para burlar a sus opositores, una cosa son estrategias militares en una guerra y otra muy distinta la política exterior, lo han hecho otros presidentes para mantener a sus gradas confiando en su líder, la política es así. En mi opinión es inaceptable que en una democracia, su presidente escriba cartas a un enemigo sin que nadie sepa que escribe y que negocia, eso es ser deshonesto y Obama actúa como un dictador.

El Presidente de los Estados Unidos actúa como 
enemigo y traidor de la nación con cartas escondidas 
y Giuliani tiene toda la razón. 
Lo triste de todo esto es que los mismos de su partido no lo cuestionan y los supuestos americanos feos sí.
Such is Life!