Trump won’t win. In fact, the US could be on the brink of a liberal renaissance
With voters set to reject their nominee, Republicans could lose control of Congress, ushering in a progressive era
There is also the Democrats’ advantage in the electoral college, the fact that Trump doesn’t have much campaign money and virtually no campaign infrastructure and the fact that many Republicans are trying to distance themselves from him. Indeed, it’s so hard to see how Trump can win that the real issue for 2016 may not be the White House, but rather Congress, which Republicans currently control and, in the case of an electoral bloodbath for the GOP, could potentially lose. If that were to happen, Hillary Clinton would have a Democratic Congress and the opportunity to push through dozens of pieces of progressive legislation.
Ironically, Trump’s rise, rather than signalling a turn toward nativist, authoritarian politics in the US, could, in the electorate’s rejection of him, usher in a more progressive political era.
Total, ellos siempre guisan.
Sí, el problema es que ella es abogada, su marido ex presidente, con grandes lealtades en Washington, un partido que los apoya, jueces del Supremo abiertamente demócratas, una prensa que los defiende y eso los convierte en poderosos, como para no lograr encausarlos. Aún así, las banderas rojas afloran.
En vez de investigar lo que dice Wikileaks, lo que hacen es seguir hablando del video que incrimina a Trump, diciendo comentarios sobre sus conquistas. La tormenta perfecta para manipular las mujeres para que elijan a una mujer que ha sido implacable con las mujeres que han sido víctimas de su marido y recibe millones de dólares de países que humillan a las mujeres, eso es bochornoso y lo peor es que las feministas endosan a Hillary, simplemente porque es mujer.
“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.
Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange
Posted on October 2, 2016
En la era de Obama-Clinton a los “whistle blowers” se los “raspan”, o al menos planean hacerlo, pero ellos fueron listos, uno está en Rusia y el otro en la Embajada de Ecuador, otro país enemigo de USA, pero, en la época de Richard Nixon erán los héroes de la democracia, hasta le llamaron “Garganta Profunda”, luego supimos hasta quien fue, y a los periodistas del Washington Post, recibieron premios al periodismo investigativo.
También nos enteramos que los íntimos de Hillary se mofan de los católicos y evangélicos...
"Ken Auletta's latest piece on Murdoch in the New Yorker starts off with the aside that both Murdoch and Robert Thompson, managing editor of the WSJ, are raising their kids Catholic. Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus," Halpin wrote in a 2011 missive to Podesta and Palmieri.
"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC and think tanks to the media and social groups. It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy," he added.
Palmieri, who MRCTV reports was also with the Center for American Progress at the time, added in the email chain that she believes Murdoch, Thomson, and many other conservatives are Catholic because they think it's "the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion."
"Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals," she added.
Halpin thought Palmieri made an "excellent point."
"Excellent point. They can throw around 'Thomistic' thought and 'subsidiarity' and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they're talking about," he wrote.
WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Confidantes Mock Evangelicals and Conservative Catholics in Podesta Emails